You are here:
English-grammar.info > Grammar by example
Rules and examples are the two sides of grammar
Which of the following two sentences is easier to memorize?
A.
What
are you doing?
B. To
ask a question in English, we normally invert the subject and the
auxiliary verb.
Whether you're a student or a teacher, you've probably decided that
example A is far easier to remember than example B, and of course you'd
be
absolutely right. It's not just because the number
of words (four in answer A, fifteen in answer B) makes answer A easier
to remember, it's also the fact that answer A is a pragmatic sentence
drawn from the experience of real life, while answer B expresses a
theoretical construct, which is the kind of thing that most people do
not bother about on a daily basis. Answer A is an example of
grammar in
context; answer B is an example of
a
grammar rule.
The path to grammatical proficiency
While it is important for language
teachers to be familiar with the rules of grammar, it may not be at all
necessary for language learners to actually learn the "rules".
For many learners, grammatical
proficiency
can be acquired far more thoroughly by remembering practical
clear
and simple examples, than by learning theoretical rules. After
all, this is the way young children gradually begin to master
the
grammar of their mother tongue, as the following example shows.
A young child, learning English
from its mother, is likely to hear the question "
What are you doing?"
hundreds of times before it is even able to speak, with the result that
when it does begin to speak, it understands – from example, not from
any rule – that "
What are you doing?"
is a question, and that it is
similar to "
Where are you going?"
or "
What do you want?"...
From these familiar examples, the child can then extrapolate
new questions, like "
Where's my rabbit?"
and so on.
Nobody will ever have told the child
that in order to ask a question in English, we normally
invert the
subject and the auxiliary (helper) verb. A young child does not even know
what grammar is,
and certainly does not know what the words
subject
and
verb
mean. That
will probably come later, in school, but even then the older child or
adolescent may still develop no understanding of grammar, nor have any
inclination to do so... a classic problem faced by English teachers
worldwide.
Nevertheless a teenager or an adult with
absolutely zero understanding of "grammar" is not necessarily
illiterate, particularly when it comes to oral communication, speaking
and listening. Knowledge of grammar rules, or grammar principles, is
only a vital skill for those who need to
write a language;
but that
means most people whose formal education continues beyond the age of
about 10, and most people who find themselves in a situation where they
need to or have to learn a second or additional language.
For anyone teaching or learning learning English in secondary
education or beyond, whether as a first language or a second or
additional language,
an
understanding of English grammar is vital.
For teachers, that means understanding and being able to explain the
simple rules; for students that means knowing how these rules are
applied - with or without any knowledge of the rules themselves.
Grammar is the highway code that learners need to follow, in
order not
just to pass their language tests, but to become proficient, to
understand what other people write and say, and to be able to correctly
express their own ideas and thoughts in speech or writing, without
ambiguity and without confusion.
The
sixty-four thousand dollar question
that bothers so many teachers is how to develop their
students' grammar
proficiency without making them learn difficult or boring rules; and
for students themselves, it is how to get better in English without the
hassle of having to learn grammar rules – which brings us back to the
start of this short article.
Best results
For the best results with the greatest
number of students, teachers need to
concentrate
on the examples,
working from examples to rules, not the other way round. After all, as
a language develops, it is the examples that come first, not
the
rules. With the exception of Esperanto, grammar rules are
devised by grammarians or linguists by looking at the examples and
extrapolating a theoretical framework to explain them. Different people
look at examples differently, producing different linguistic theories
and different ways of analysing language; but where there may be
many different ways of looking at a single sample sentence, and
different
kinds of grammar to explain it, in the end what is important is the
sample sentence
itself. Take
I know (that) my father has been looking for a new job for years.
This sentence can be used to illustrate
a lot of different points of grammar - main clause and dependent
clause, possessive adjectives, adverb clauses of time, choice of tense/
verb form, phrasal verbs, and more. And it can be disected in many different ways, using different methods of grammatical analysis.
Indeed, any phrase or sentence
can be used as the illustration of one or more points of grammar, since
it is its grammaticality - its adherence to grammatical conventions - that gives it meaning. We understand that
My oldest friend is a London
based artist called Mark Winter
means that Mark Winter is the name of my oldest friend, and that he is
an artist who works in London.
However the
meaning will
only be correctly conveyed if the producer (speaker,
writer) applies the correct rules of vocabulary and grammar, relating
to subjects and verbs, punctuation, spelling, adjective position, and
so on. We need only make one tiny change to the sentence and either its
meaning changes (examples 1 to 3), or it means nothing at all. Example
4, where the words are in alphabetical order, and without capitals, is
totally meaningless:
- My oldest friend was a
London based artist called Mark Winter.
- My oldest friend is a London
base artist called Mark Winter.
- My oldest friend is a London
based cyclist called Mark Winter.
- a artist based called friend is london mark my oldest winter.
While this set of sentences shows how a
single error of
grammar or
vocabulary can distort meaning, it is not the kind of sentence to
remember as an example of a specific point of grammar. Sentences to use
as examples need to be relevant and clear, such as.
Yes, I eat hamburgurs, but I'm not
eating one right now.
which is a clear illustration of the difference in usage and
meaning between the simple present and the present progressive
forms of the verb. Or
I had to buy a new phone, I must have
left my old one on the train.
illustrating the difference between
must have and
had to, which can be
very confusing for learners. Or
He goes
to Chicago after New York; afterwards he's going to
Minneapolis.
which shows the use of
after
as a preposition and
afterwards
as an adverb... as well as showing different ways of expressing future time. Or we can take the very succinct aphorism
Seeing is believing
- which is the clearest possible illustration of the use of
gerunds, i.e. verbs behaving
as if they were nouns – which they are not. (see Rossiter, 2020, p38*) .
The examples above
have been chosen randomly. Most teachers and learners, particularly in
the context of formal education, use manuals and books with some kind
of grammar-based progression, though the grammar is not always clearly
explained and examples not always helpful. Many teachers (whether
native speakers or not) do not have a clear understanding of the rules
of English grammar, even though they have a gut feeling for what is
right and what is wrong; and most teachers have found themselves in a
situation where a student asks a question about English grammar that
they are unable to answer. It happens to everyone, even the best
teachers.
Having access to a personal database of
examples, or even better to a good reference grammar with plenty of
examples, can help the teacher provide the answers to the questions
that students ask, and better still do so with clear and memorable
examples that will help students develop their language proficiency
without necessarily having to "learn grammar".
ReferencesAndrew Rossiter
A Descriptive Grammar of English - by example. 2020.
Paperback or ebook